The Bears Pit: v1.13 Coding Talk » (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver)

Home » MODDING HQ 1.13 » v1.13 Coding Talk » (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver)

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: The NAS Receiver[message #303877]

Wed, 25 April 2012 01:45

Flugente

Messages:3507
Registered:April 2009
Location: Germany

So you're thinking about a receiver/rail system? Nice one. That would really ease up things.

You've already thought about AK-receivers, so you'd obviously need a distinction for ARs between NATO and AK. Perhaps even more (chinese stuff?). Same for sniper rifles (NATO vs. WP bc of scopes (PSO-3) ).

How would you handle new rail system vs. 'unrailed' guns? I mean, there might be attachments that fit on a M16A4 but do not fit on a M16A1.

Magwell adapters only fit for a specific caliber. How would you handle that?

Foregrips wouldn't make sense on single-shot shotguns, but would be useful on automatic shotguns, so you'd need 2 flags there...

SMGs that already have a built-in silencer won't accept a new one, so you'd need new tags there. This is under the assumption that the silencer effect has been calculated into the weapon stats, if its just a inseparable default attachment than your system is ok.

Don't get me wrong, I like your idea. I guess what I'm saying is that once this gets adopted, people will soon find guns that are in some way distinct, and you'll therefore need a lot of new flags. If you add new flags afterwards, you'll have a ton of work.

[Updated on: Wed, 25 April 2012 01:54] by Moderator

Report message to a moderator

Captain

[Message index]

		(New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Wed, 25 April 2012 01:27
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Flugente on Wed, 25 April 2012 01:45
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Madd_Mugsy on Wed, 25 April 2012 02:21
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Flugente on Wed, 25 April 2012 02:49
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: DepressivesBrot on Wed, 25 April 2012 18:40
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Wil473 on Wed, 25 April 2012 18:51
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Madd_Mugsy on Wed, 25 April 2012 20:21
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: dinglehopper on Wed, 25 April 2012 23:41
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Madd_Mugsy on Thu, 26 April 2012 09:44
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: dinglehopper on Thu, 26 April 2012 10:05
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Wil473 on Thu, 26 April 2012 10:07
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: dinglehopper on Thu, 26 April 2012 10:16
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: DepressivesBrot on Thu, 26 April 2012 11:31
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: dinglehopper on Thu, 26 April 2012 16:17
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Wil473 on Thu, 26 April 2012 16:48
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Madd_Mugsy on Thu, 26 April 2012 18:11
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Wil473 on Thu, 26 April 2012 18:16
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Madd_Mugsy on Fri, 27 April 2012 09:20
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: DepressivesBrot on Fri, 27 April 2012 10:32
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: JMich on Fri, 27 April 2012 10:50
		(New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Wil473 on Fri, 27 April 2012 18:19
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Fri, 27 April 2012 19:26
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Gambigobilla on Fri, 27 April 2012 23:54
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Sat, 28 April 2012 02:46
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Sun, 29 April 2012 21:46
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Wil473 on Sun, 29 April 2012 23:20
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Mon, 30 April 2012 06:11
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Flugente on Sun, 03 June 2012 14:24
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Wil473 on Sun, 03 June 2012 18:14
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Sun, 03 June 2012 21:58
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Flugente on Mon, 04 June 2012 01:40
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Mon, 04 June 2012 03:52
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Flugente on Mon, 04 June 2012 21:08
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Mon, 04 June 2012 21:57
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Flugente on Mon, 04 June 2012 22:08
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Tue, 05 June 2012 00:25
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Flugente on Tue, 05 June 2012 00:29
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Tue, 05 June 2012 00:34
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: DepressivesBrot on Tue, 05 June 2012 00:36
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Flugente on Tue, 05 June 2012 00:38
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Tue, 05 June 2012 00:43
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Flugente on Tue, 05 June 2012 01:00
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Wil473 on Thu, 07 June 2012 22:38
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Fri, 08 June 2012 00:20
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: alwaysfirst on Sat, 01 August 2015 19:35
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Wil473 on Sun, 02 August 2015 01:44
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Wil473 on Sun, 07 April 2013 19:19

Previous Topic:	New Stealth Mechanics
Next Topic:	[IDEA] New Magazine System

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Sat Jan 25 10:04:43 GMT+2 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01463 seconds