The Bears Pit: v1.13 Coding Talk » (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver)

Home » MODDING HQ 1.13 » v1.13 Coding Talk » (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver)

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

(New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver)[message #303980]

Fri, 27 April 2012 18:19

Wil473

Messages:2815
Registered:September 2004
Location: Canada

Madd Mugsy

BTW, using your bitmask list above, I had trouble figuring out where sniper rifles fit in. A sniper rifle should be able to have rails to mount a Rifle LAM, but without some additional differentiation, I ended up with foregrips and GLs on my sniper rifles LMGs face a similar issue.

Generic Tac Rail covered DMR = 4 + 4096 = 4100 (RIS Optics + Top RIS Hand Guard)

However, the non-RIS bipods in my mod present a bit of a problem for me. I've got three of the things: Bipod(original Ja2), Integral Bipod, and Heavy (Integral) Bipod. They don't always go into the same NAS slot as the integrals are kept out of the way so that underbarrel slot may still take a grip, RIS hand guard, or grenade launcher. For my purposes weapons that don't have a hand guard RIS of some sort, DMR/LAM/rifles, will just have the bipods assigned in Attachments.XML.

In addition to the two Attachment/receiver bundles I added yesterday, though of two more:

FN FAL Hand Guard - Bipod, Grip, FAL RIS Hand Guard
Misc. Classic Rifle Front End - Bipod, Grip, Universal RIS Block

Updated List:

0	None
1	pistol under barrel rail
2	pistol modular sights - Match, Reflex, Compact Holo Sights
4	RIS Optics
8	Russian Small Arms (RSA) Optics
16	SVD Optics
32	Scope Rings
64	HK Clamp Optics - Aim-Point-Projector, Clamp 4x Scope, RIS rail
128	AR-15 Carrying Handle - optics and a RIS rail
256	Modular Tactical Stock - yes I know one bit isn't going going to be enough for AIMNAS and all its stocks
512	Light RIS Hand Guard - RIS Grips, RIS Bipods, LAM
1024	Medium RIS Hand Guard - above + M203QD
2048	Heavy RIS Hand Guard - above + all RIS Launchers
4096	Top RIS Hand Guard - LAM's and RIS Bipod (weapon hangs from bipod)
8192	AK Hand Guard - Bipod, Grip, GP-30, RIS Handguard
16384	MP5 Hand Guard - Bipod, Grip, RIS Tri-Rail
32768	G3 Hand Guard - above + HK79
65536	M16 Hand Guard - Bipod, Grip, M203, three sizes of RIS Quad
131072	M4 Hand Guard - Bipod, Grip, two sizes of RIS Quad incl. the MWS which allows short barrel M203QD to be attached
262144	Pistol Suppressors
524288	Magnum Suppressors
1048576	Intermediate Cartridge Suppressor
2097152	AK Suppressors
4194304	Hi-Power Ammo Suppressor
8388608	40mm NATO Grenades
16777216	40mm Russian Grenades
33554432	37mm Grenades
67108864	Basic Vest Attachments
134217728	SMG suppressors (Smeagol will need this one)
268435456	Shotgun muzzle - forgot about the chokes and in the case of mods, shotgun suppressors
536870912	FN FAL Hand Guard - Bipod, Grip, FAL RIS Hand Guard
1073741824	Misc. Classic Rifle Front End - Bipod, Grip, Universal RIS Block

Modders will be able to adjust what each bit in the bitmask is used for right? I'm only thinking of examples of common attachment/weapon groups. I have not optimized it by sorting it for frequency of use (most common attachments/weapon groups with lower integers). Then again if there is a user-friendly interface in the XML Editor for setting up these lists, sorting the bitmask becomes a moot point.

EDIT: sorry inadvertently renamed the topic back to the old name. Copied new title from the first post. EDIT2: on closer examination, it looks like we just kept the old name after the change to the first post...

[Updated on: Fri, 27 April 2012 18:33] by Moderator

Report message to a moderator

Lieutenant

[Message index]

		(New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Wed, 25 April 2012 01:27
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Flugente on Wed, 25 April 2012 01:45
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Madd_Mugsy on Wed, 25 April 2012 02:21
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Flugente on Wed, 25 April 2012 02:49
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: DepressivesBrot on Wed, 25 April 2012 18:40
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Wil473 on Wed, 25 April 2012 18:51
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Madd_Mugsy on Wed, 25 April 2012 20:21
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: dinglehopper on Wed, 25 April 2012 23:41
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Madd_Mugsy on Thu, 26 April 2012 09:44
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: dinglehopper on Thu, 26 April 2012 10:05
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Wil473 on Thu, 26 April 2012 10:07
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: dinglehopper on Thu, 26 April 2012 10:16
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: DepressivesBrot on Thu, 26 April 2012 11:31
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: dinglehopper on Thu, 26 April 2012 16:17
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Wil473 on Thu, 26 April 2012 16:48
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Madd_Mugsy on Thu, 26 April 2012 18:11
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Wil473 on Thu, 26 April 2012 18:16
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: Madd_Mugsy on Fri, 27 April 2012 09:20
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: DepressivesBrot on Fri, 27 April 2012 10:32
		Re: The NAS Receiver By: JMich on Fri, 27 April 2012 10:50
		(New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Wil473 on Fri, 27 April 2012 18:19
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Fri, 27 April 2012 19:26
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Gambigobilla on Fri, 27 April 2012 23:54
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Sat, 28 April 2012 02:46
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Sun, 29 April 2012 21:46
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Wil473 on Sun, 29 April 2012 23:20
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Mon, 30 April 2012 06:11
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Flugente on Sun, 03 June 2012 14:24
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Wil473 on Sun, 03 June 2012 18:14
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Sun, 03 June 2012 21:58
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Flugente on Mon, 04 June 2012 01:40
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Mon, 04 June 2012 03:52
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Flugente on Mon, 04 June 2012 21:08
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Mon, 04 June 2012 21:57
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Flugente on Mon, 04 June 2012 22:08
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Tue, 05 June 2012 00:25
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Flugente on Tue, 05 June 2012 00:29
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Tue, 05 June 2012 00:34
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: DepressivesBrot on Tue, 05 June 2012 00:36
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Flugente on Tue, 05 June 2012 00:38
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Tue, 05 June 2012 00:43
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Flugente on Tue, 05 June 2012 01:00
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Wil473 on Thu, 07 June 2012 22:38
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Madd_Mugsy on Fri, 08 June 2012 00:20
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: alwaysfirst on Sat, 01 August 2015 19:35
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Wil473 on Sun, 02 August 2015 01:44
		Re: (New) Common Attachment Framework (new title; was The NAS Receiver) By: Wil473 on Sun, 07 April 2013 19:19

Previous Topic:	New Stealth Mechanics
Next Topic:	[IDEA] New Magazine System

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Fri Jan 10 10:21:31 GMT+2 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01477 seconds