|
|
|
Re: Another competing faction. - People's Revolutionary Front of Arulco[message #346170 is a reply to message #346162] |
Sun, 10 July 2016 17:51  | |
edmortimer
|
  |
Messages:1379
Registered:January 2015 Location: Home Free |
|
|
It is possible to do some of what you want, and I have already done that in Arulco Vacations. You can create a civilian faction, arm and equip them, tie them to a named NPC, and have them go hostile if the Player attacks them or the named NPC. They will keep re-spawning (unless other precautions are taken) and attack the Player when the Player comes into their sectors. We can even give them simple dialogue so if the Player talks with them before they go hostile the Player can understand what the faction stands for.
What we can't do at this time is give them real dialogue and the power to make strategic decisions as the Queen does. That would be nice, but I doubt if anyone who is coding will code this.
In AV, using an idea thrown out by Flugente, I gave T-Rex (Jasmin, the U.S. militia terrorist) a militia of indigenous people who are neither on the Queen's side, nor Miguel's side ("We don't want a Queen or a King!") -- as it is entirely realistic that the oppressed indigenous people of Arulco (over in the Chitzena area) would want to overthrow completely the colonial powers that control their land and cause so much grief and bloodshed.
As well, I gave Tony a bigger operation by uniting him with his gun smugglers out in the country -- and they too will turn hostile if you attack Tony or any of them.
So, yes, I think there's room for more faction depth in JA2, and a deeper plot within the original story, but I don't see the code happening that will make it possible.
EDIT: I should also add that I also made it possible to recruit T-Rex, and theoretically that would put his militia on your side . . . but unfortunately neutral factions (as they start out) do not attack the Queen's forces when the Queen attacks their associated named NPC. As well, you can't make a new faction that starts hostile to the Queen.
[Updated on: Sun, 10 July 2016 18:08]
|
|
|
|