Home » PLAYER'S HQ 1.13 » JA2 Complete Mods & Sequels » AIMNAS Archives » AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9
Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #290423] Wed, 07 September 2011 20:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JMich

 
Messages:569
Registered:January 2011
Location: Greece
Adding a buckshot to the grenade launcher merges the items, resulting in a direct-fire M79 and a buckshot round. Adding an explosive round to a direct-fire M79 merges them, resulting in a grenade launcher and an explosive round. So the "Cool" sound, was the "Merger Succesful" sound, but not the reloading one (is there a "Reload Succesful" quote?).

As for the graphical glitch, that is probably an exe related bug, which smeag has no access to. Think it was mentioned some time before, but can't quite recall.
Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #290424] Wed, 07 September 2011 20:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DepressivesBrot

 
Messages:3804
Registered:July 2009
I don't know if this explains all your issues, but there is one thing you need to know about this weapon:
The buckshot grenade literally turns the M79 into a shotgun. It's a different item because you can't fire ballistic and direct attack munitions from the same weapon. So if you start with the M79 Grenade Launcher (GL), the first time you try to load a 40mm BS, it'll actually trigger a merge to produce the M79 Direct Shot Launcher (DSL). You can then load the M79 DSL with 40mm BS as you would load any other gun. If you try to load a regular grenade into the DSL, it'll trigger a merge that changes the M79 back to the GL version, which will accept all regular grenades.


Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #290430] Wed, 07 September 2011 22:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Pariah

 
Messages:79
Registered:June 2004
Location: Suckit City, OH

Jmich, you are right of course about the the speech, it was the 'cool' something new speech.

DepressiveBrot: Thanks for the explanation, I did not know that and have yet to read about that happening with the M79. Prior to posting I did a search in the AIMNAS directory for "40mm Buckshot" and the previous posts I had made in this thread were the only ones to show up. I will try it again to see if I can load the thing in Tactical map.
Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #290448] Thu, 08 September 2011 11:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Logisteric

 
Messages:3381
Registered:December 2008
Location: B
JMich
... (is there a "Reload Succesful" quote?).


guess this ios a rethorical one - gonna answer it anyway

[color:#CC0000]nope[/color]
Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291091] Sun, 25 September 2011 08:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Victor Tadeu

 
Messages:35
Registered:February 2010
Location: Brazil
smeagol
More new stuff... some new Chilenean Famae guns:

http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/8158/famaecollection.gif

From top to bottom:
CT-40 Police Carbine (.40S&W)
CT-30 (.30 carbine)
MT-40 SMG (.40 S&W)


CT-40, CT-30 and MT-40 arent made by the chilenean Famae, they are all made by the brazilian Taurus. Taurus build the Famae SAF design and produce it under the name MT-9, later, converted it to .40 caliber, the MT-40. Taurus also made the carbine version of this gun, the CT-40 and the same gun in .30, the CT-30. CT means Carabina Taurus (Taurus' Carbine) and MT means Metralhadora Taurus (Tauru's Machinegun).

It's all over the internet that these weapons are from Famae, but it's wrong. They hav a partnership but the leading company was Taurus, as you can see by the name of the guns. Taurus change the caliber to .40 because the brazilian police preferences and made it in .30 cause in the period brazilian police forces still uses the M1 Carbine and hav a lot of .30 ammunition.

Also, Taurus presented this year the evolution of MT-9 and MT-40, MT-9 G2 and MT-40 G2 respectively (Gera

[Updated on: Sun, 25 September 2011 09:12] by Moderator

Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291095] Sun, 25 September 2011 11:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
smeagol

 
Messages:2726
Registered:June 2008
Location: Bremen, Germany
Thanks for pointing that out. While doing research on those 3 I also found a lot of references to Taurus, but the site from which I took the pics had listed them under FAMAE, I simply took that brand name... I'll change it.


Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291099] Sun, 25 September 2011 13:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Victor Tadeu

 
Messages:35
Registered:February 2010
Location: Brazil
No, no... thank you! Your pics are much better than the ones that I did! Mine MT-40 dont hav that tactical looks so I will pick the one I did and make a MT-40 + Rails = Tactical MT-40 (I do it a lot)!

By the way, even in the brazilian Tauru's site this guns are named "Taurus/Famae CT-30". I had to do a research to understand why. The only site in english that said something about it is world.guns.ru. The only one I found, at least.

Well, is good to know I contributed with this great mod even this small bit.

[Updated on: Sun, 25 September 2011 13:10] by Moderator

Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291292] Thu, 29 September 2011 17:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous
Smeagol,

What is planned for the near future in AIMNAS?

I was just wondering because I started playing again and realized what a great modification it is.

Also,

I know this is S.T.O.M.P. related, although; Numb has lost his Night Ops trait. His M.E.R.C. bio still mentions it though.

Thanks,
Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291310] Thu, 29 September 2011 21:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Parkan

 
Messages:451
Registered:April 2010
Location: Russia,Sevastopol

.Hello Smeagol i want to ask you.When the new version of aimnas will be available?Me and 2 of my comrades just want to test new version of aimnas in multiplayer mod =)
Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291557] Wed, 05 October 2011 11:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Boog

 
Messages:51
Registered:October 2011
Location: Ukraine
Good day to you all JA2 fans. I'm giving another try to JA2 1.13 after the new build was released (it's my 3d or 4th playthrough probably). Just heard of this mod and I
Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291558] Wed, 05 October 2011 11:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
The_Bob

 
Messages:410
Registered:May 2009
Location: Behind you.
Boog
1. Does this mod support latest 1.13 build?
2. Does this mod support or activates HAM features like suppression fire, etc.?
3. Should I start a new game after installing?
4. Where can I find a direct link to the latest version?


1. The last I tried, it worked fine with the latest svn and test builds.
2. By default, AIMNAS activates HAM features. It comes with modified JA2 configs that tweak some HAM values.
3. Yep. Even if an old save loads, things will be messed up a bit.
4. Try the Single Click Installer (SCI) thread or follow the link in smeag's signature.

Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291559] Wed, 05 October 2011 11:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Boog

 
Messages:51
Registered:October 2011
Location: Ukraine
Thanks for the answers! I've already read FAQ (I
Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291600] Thu, 06 October 2011 09:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Boog

 
Messages:51
Registered:October 2011
Location: Ukraine
I'm terribly sorry for doublepost.

Just started playing, haven't gotten the feeling of the mod yet, but I must say new maps look really interesting. Much more various items and more importantly places for cover. But I have a question.

What files are responsible for starting gear after completing establishing your own mercs in IMP? I'm used to old 1.13 scheme where you could get a decent mp5 + some clips - nothing really powerful. I'm playing with "no drop all" and low BR progress of goods. So starting the game with auto rifles, armor, grenades and lots of ammo makes my gameplay way too easy in the beginning.

I'm not complaining or anything and I
Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291629] Thu, 06 October 2011 20:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Gorro der Grüne

 
Messages:1540
Registered:March 2009
Location: Broadwurschd-City
Boog
I'm terribly sorry for doublepost.



one of our greatest modders (scared away by annother great modder) and our skirtwearing HeMod prefer pentaposts to say good morning.


NO problem



[color:#FF0000]EDIT: WARNING FOR SPAM!

If you got nothin' to say -> don't spam ze thread... [/color]

[Updated on: Thu, 06 October 2011 21:08] by Moderator

Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291634] Thu, 06 October 2011 21:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
smeagol

 
Messages:2726
Registered:June 2008
Location: Bremen, Germany
tao
Smeagol,

What is planned for the near future in AIMNAS?

I was just wondering because I started playing again and realized what a great modification it is.

Also,

I know this is S.T.O.M.P. related, although; Numb has lost his Night Ops trait. His M.E.R.C. bio still mentions it though.

Thanks,


I reworked merc saleries and I'm currently reworking some starting gear stuff. I began working on big maps again, as well (nothing big yet, just reworked the starting sector a bit... still not 100% satisfied with the map, so I might have to spent a bit more work on that before I actually can begin with a new map). I don't know if I'm patient enough to wait for the re-worked tileset stuff or not... probably not, so I guess I might be able to pick up work on the huge bigmaps project (as my main university stuff is finished... still have to go through final exam, but the registering part should be done now...).

Still quite busy in reallife, but I try to get a few hours of modding work in here and there. Don't expect fast paced work as it used to be, things have changed a bit (a.k.a. responsibility has taken over etc. Wink ).


Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291681] Sat, 08 October 2011 01:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Boog

 
Messages:51
Registered:October 2011
Location: Ukraine
Adding folding stock raises draw cost instead of lowering it. Example, adding folding stock to RPK-74 changes draw cast from 15 to 17. Bug?
Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291696] Sat, 08 October 2011 13:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DepressivesBrot

 
Messages:3804
Registered:July 2009
It's no stock < folding stock < fixed stock, working as intended.


Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291702] Sat, 08 October 2011 17:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
smeagol

 
Messages:2726
Registered:June 2008
Location: Bremen, Germany
Some more stuff I just added:


C8A2:

http://img825.imageshack.us/img825/1362/c7a2.gif


Saiga 12k SWAT:

http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/268/saiga12kswat.gif


Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291719] Sat, 08 October 2011 23:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous
smeagol


Saiga 12k SWAT:

http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/268/saiga12kswat.gif


Holy S**T!

That thing looks deadly....


Also,

Mossberg time yet?
Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291729] Sun, 09 October 2011 05:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Boog

 
Messages:51
Registered:October 2011
Location: Ukraine
DepressivesBrot
It's no stock < folding stock < fixed stock, working as intended.

Em... So how does this system work exactly? There's no point in adding any stock modifications, cause they just increase draw cost? I can't grasp the idea. Please, explain.

I remember in 1.13 adding some sort of folding stock decreased the draw cost. That's was the point.

And what the purpose of the solid stock as attachment then? There's some other bonuses?

Sorry, I'm new to the whole concept.

2 smeagol
Good looking stuff, thumbs up!

[Updated on: Sun, 09 October 2011 05:01] by Moderator

Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291733] Sun, 09 October 2011 08:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Hawkeye

 
Messages:1931
Registered:October 2005
Location: Australia
Hey Smeagol, you ever get to implement my builders digger/excavator yet?


Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291735] Sun, 09 October 2011 10:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DepressivesBrot

 
Messages:3804
Registered:July 2009
There's a pretty harsh CTH penalty (~ -30) on any weapon without stock, as well as high burst / auto penalties in exchange for very low draw costs. A full stock completely negates the CTH penalty and lowers the burst/auto ones by a big margin, yet also raises draw costs the most. The folding stocks are a bit worse at negating those penalties, but also have a lesser impact on draw cost.


Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291737] Sun, 09 October 2011 11:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Boog

 
Messages:51
Registered:October 2011
Location: Ukraine
DepressivesBrot
There's a pretty harsh CTH penalty (~ -30) on any weapon without stock, as well as high burst / auto penalties in exchange for very low draw costs. A full stock completely negates the CTH penalty and lowers the burst/auto ones by a big margin, yet also raises draw costs the most. The folding stocks are a bit worse at negating those penalties, but also have a lesser impact on draw cost.

Thanks! Now I see, interesting.

I saw some people reporting small bugs, I noticed one too. Sorry if it's not appropriate in this thread.

There's a small error in general description of the gun: "folding folding stock".

http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/9729/foldingstock.th.jpg

Another question. Got a suppressor after IMP procedure, but it can't fit any possible smg or pistol:

http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/3742/suppressorx.th.jpg
Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291739] Sun, 09 October 2011 11:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DepressivesBrot

 
Messages:3804
Registered:July 2009
For the moment, try a pistol <= 7.62mm, Tokarev TT-33 works, also most .22lr weapons (including the Calico M100 carbine) and the FN Five-seveN or the HK UCP (although you'll hardly have one of those already).

Should be fixed to match IMP starting guns in a future patch though.


Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291741] Sun, 09 October 2011 11:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
smeagol

 
Messages:2726
Registered:June 2008
Location: Bremen, Germany
Think I have already ixed the suppressor missmatch in IMP gear. This will be in the next version.


Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291744] Sun, 09 October 2011 12:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Taro_M

 
Messages:296
Registered:November 2008
Could you prepere alternative starting gear? Starting only with items that can be found in first battle is very nice challange. Personally I always throw away ALL gear at start (after first battle). Of course this would be alternative.

BTW: Have you seen my submod that gives NCTH to all new stuff?

Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291745] Sun, 09 October 2011 12:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Gorro der Grüne

 
Messages:1540
Registered:March 2009
Location: Broadwurschd-City
he has 5 alternative gears.

what to You want alternative sets (= 5 new alternatives)?

:gaga:

Do You know which time is necessary to make suiting (the merc and the mod) gearkits?
oc You may have standards like every merc comes with 7 high-end guns and 10.000 rounds + ....

:gaga::gaga::gaga::gaga::gaga::gaga:
Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291746] Sun, 09 October 2011 12:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Taro_M

 
Messages:296
Registered:November 2008
Oh, sorry, I ment IMP gear. It was just an idea, only if it isnt too much work.
Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291760] Sun, 09 October 2011 18:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Boog

 
Messages:51
Registered:October 2011
Location: Ukraine
2 Taro

Personally I just took the original 1.13 IMPItemChoices.xml from Jagged Alliance 2 Gold\Data-1.13\TableData and paste it in Jagged Alliance 2 Gold\Data-AIM\TableData.

I got a decent mp5 + some clips and minimum armour, just like in the 1.13.
Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291836] Tue, 11 October 2011 09:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Boog

 
Messages:51
Registered:October 2011
Location: Ukraine
Sorry for doublepost again.

Zylon Combat Suit doesn't seem to add any camo effect, though it
Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291837] Tue, 11 October 2011 09:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DepressivesBrot

 
Messages:3804
Registered:July 2009
Wearing any vest type LBE of the same camo type? LBE camo always overwrites armor camo.

Drassen mine is modern and uses elevators (eastern corner of the main building)


Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291907] Wed, 12 October 2011 13:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
smeagol

 
Messages:2726
Registered:June 2008
Location: Bremen, Germany
Reworked Cetme Ameli:

http://img842.imageshack.us/img842/3070/cetmev2.gif


Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291920] Wed, 12 October 2011 15:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Boog

 
Messages:51
Registered:October 2011
Location: Ukraine
Probably the wrong topic, but since i'm playing particularly this mod, here's a question:

Is there a list of combinations (shift + something) to effectively operate in sector items window. Preferably commands to merge all mags, items, reload/unload weapons, drop all, etc?

Thanks!

2 Smeagol
Very nice. It's just a new image or you also tweaked weapon stats?

[Updated on: Wed, 12 October 2011 15:33] by Moderator

Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291921] Wed, 12 October 2011 15:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Sam Hotte

 
Messages:2011
Registered:March 2009
Location: Middle of Germany
http://ja2v113.pbworks.com/w/page/40802363/Jagged%20Alliance%202%201%2013%20Hot%20Keys
Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291926] Wed, 12 October 2011 17:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
smeagol

 
Messages:2726
Registered:June 2008
Location: Bremen, Germany
Boog
Very nice. It's just a new image or you also tweaked weapon stats?


I rework some stuff atm. Some pics that simply looked either bad or blurry, but I also rework some stats, as well.
Some tweaking here, some tweaking there. Nothing too big, only a few minor changes.



Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291931] Wed, 12 October 2011 19:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Taro_M

 
Messages:296
Registered:November 2008
Could you add Dragon Skin body armor? To be honest Im suprised that it still didnt show up in 1.13.

Wiki article

Manufacturer site

http://www.pinnaclearmor.com/images/mar-ciras.jpg

[Updated on: Wed, 12 October 2011 19:31] by Moderator

Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291933] Wed, 12 October 2011 19:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
smeagol

 
Messages:2726
Registered:June 2008
Location: Bremen, Germany
Dragonskin has been in AIMNAS for quite a long time... Wink


Resized CZ-75B (the 1.13 one is waaaaaaaaaay too small compared to other handguns of the same size):

http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/1193/cz75bv2.gif

[Updated on: Wed, 12 October 2011 19:49] by Moderator



Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291935] Wed, 12 October 2011 20:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Taro_M

 
Messages:296
Registered:November 2008
Oops, it escaped my atention Very Happy.
Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291971] Thu, 13 October 2011 17:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Taro_M

 
Messages:296
Registered:November 2008
Just a word. Maybe you should make vintage guns like Garand or BAR etc. incompatible with modern attachments. Personally I find it odd that you can attach laser sight, reflex sight and x7 scope to normal Garand. Whats the point of Garand EBR then? After all that conversion is just so you can mount modern attachments on Garand.
Re: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 9[message #291973] Thu, 13 October 2011 18:33 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Kellomies

 
Messages:50
Registered:October 2010
Speaking of the vintage guns, I must say I am quite mystified by the inclusion of the M1979 Reichsrevolver. The thing oughta be pretty solidly museum/collector piece by now, and more to the point, no WAY it's going to handle .44 Mag. This guy observes its 10,6x25R mm cartridge was virtually identical to the .44 Russian - another late-1800s black-powder cartridge - and I've a hunch that trying to shoot the order of magnitude more energetic .44 Magnum, a potent smokeless-powder load, from the thing will result in spectacular structural failures.
AKA the thing blowing up in your hand.
Also, dunno where that pic came from (it looks like one of Colt's oldies though), but the Reichsrevolver it ain't; this is what the thing actually looks like:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/48/Reichsrevolver_Model_1883_1297.jpg
Previous Topic: AIMNAS WF2011 Part 8
Next Topic: AIMNAS WF2012 Part 10
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Jun 20 08:25:43 EEST 2019

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03342 seconds