|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: AIMNAS WF2012 Part 10[message #305196]
|
Sat, 26 May 2012 14:45
|
|
Alas86 |
|
Messages:32
Registered:October 2010 |
|
|
On an unrelated note I don't understand why there are some weapons that can't fit in any pockets, not even the main weapon pocket. I understand that it might be there to limit gamey tactics of having one big gun in your hand and another in that pocket, but I think that the weight of these big guns is enough of a deterrent already, plus I like having nothing in my mercs hands when I'm in a calm sector and that's sth I just can't do if my main gun doesn't fit in my gun pocket.
That said, I still was ok with it until I decided to give my sniper the sniper backpack to store her rifle, I thought I'd keep an mp7 in her main gun pocket and keep the sniper in the backpack, I can't access the backpack in combat so it would be a good way to be more methodical and all(though being able to access the backpack albeit at a very high ap cost would make more sense imo), then I try to put her osv-96 in the backpack only to find out it doesn't fit in the sniper pocket... what's the point of a sniper pocket then?
I wouldn't mind if the big guns needed to be taken apart or whatever to fit in the pocket(this is probably possible with HAM5), I think it would make sense anyway that these guns need to be prepared before you use them and that's why there are sidearms for those ambushes, but I just can't understand the reasoning of not being able to fit them anywhere.
PS Smeagol, can you maybe tell me what I need to alter to make it possible for the osv-96 to fit in the sniper pocket?
EDIT: Its ok, I think I found out how to do it myself.
[Updated on: Sat, 26 May 2012 15:19] by Moderator Report message to a moderator
|
Private 1st Class
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: AIMNAS WF2012 Part 10[message #305202]
|
Sat, 26 May 2012 16:10
|
|
Alas86 |
|
Messages:32
Registered:October 2010 |
|
|
DepressivesBrotAlasAnd the solution to that was that they should be carried in their hands all the time? But that makes even less sense. Sure does, how else do you carry unwieldy stuff? You take them apart I guess. Besides you said there was no penalty, but what about the weight? An FN MAG weighs like 10kgs, more than double what most assault rifles do. There is a penalty. Also there is the ap cost to ready a gun.
[Updated on: Sat, 26 May 2012 16:12] by Moderator Report message to a moderator
|
Private 1st Class
|
|
|
|
Re: AIMNAS WF2012 Part 10[message #305215]
|
Sat, 26 May 2012 23:42
|
|
Alas86 |
|
Messages:32
Registered:October 2010 |
|
|
DepressivesBrotYou can't just take a rifle apart and expect it to hit after putting it back together. And a 10kg MAG is peanuts for a guy like Grizzly, that doesn't make it any less unwieldy and restrictive when moving around.
Edit: We could use a carry frame for oversized cannons though, we even discussed it when revising sizes ... @smeag did you drop the idea or did you just forget it (as usual ) Well, I do take my inspiration for that idea from movies, so I don't really know how accurate it is, seems to make sense though. And Grizzly is like the exception anyway, not that I would ever give an FN MAG to Grizzly, he is a heavy weapons dude.
Anyway, carry frames sound good too, just sth that would make a bit more sense than what's going on now.
Report message to a moderator
|
Private 1st Class
|
|
|
|
|
Re: AIMNAS WF2012 Part 10[message #305241]
|
Mon, 28 May 2012 00:19
|
|
PengMen |
Messages:2
Registered:May 2012 Location: Germany |
|
|
Hello,
this is really a nice mod. But can anybody tell me please how or where I can get an AK Conversion Kit?
THX
Report message to a moderator
|
Civilian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|