Home » FULL CONTROL GAMES » JA: Flashback (Solutions. Tips. Spoilers!) » Morale
| | | |
|
Re: Moral[message #321166] |
Thu, 30 May 2013 02:46   | |
| Mauser
|
 |
Messages:769
Registered:August 2006
Location: Bavaria - Germany |
|
|
|
I think we must differentiate between tactical morale and strategical morale.
Tactical morale is, when enemy soldiers see their squadmates getting slaughtered by the dozens and decide to flee for their lives or simply surrender against overwhelming opposition or due to crippling injury that makes it pointless for them to fight on.
Strategic morale is, when the enemy AI becomes more careful and defensive after too many failed assaults on the player and the overall combat effectiveness and cohesion of its troops, especially the lower tiers, suffers in general. Maybe even having the overall reputation of the player affect how enemies behave in both strategic and tactical regards.
The first thing would be a nice and sensible feature to have, opening up the possibility to conquer a sector by merely making the enemy force panicking, by eliminating their leaders/officers, applying overwhelming firepower and surprise or compromising their defensive positions by flanking, forcing them to retreat instead of getting slaughtered to the last man, but also risking that the enemy could regroup in an adjacent sector and come back in greater force.
It would help to make the AI feel more "alive" if enemies could be forced to surrender or retreat, instead of having to hunt down and slaughter every last one of them like mindless robots.
This would also help to differentiate JA:F from other games and genres, where slaughtering enemies down to the last one is basically mandatory and standard behavior, which is not in actual war, giving it a more realistic vibe and also enhance the roleplaying aspect, by giving the player the choice to take prisoners for interrogation and maybe even converting them to aid you or simply slaughtering everyone, adding dread to your reputation as a merciless and ruthless mercenary, probably also affecting who is actually willing to join your cause.
Complex moral choices affecting the gameplay profoundly is what makes the Witcher games such special and deep RPGs. Giving JA:F some of that depth and complexity would surely help to set it apart and make it stand out even further.
But that would definitely be an advanced bonus feature and not something mandatory for the base game.
|
☆★GL★☆
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Moral[message #321172] |
Thu, 30 May 2013 04:10 | |
| grim
|
 |
Messages:349
Registered:July 2006
Location: France |
|
|
|
FlugenteThere has always been enemy morale in the game. It's the reason they can flee when critical for example.
The problem in JA2 now is when someone is hurt, even more when critical, he can't do anything valuable, and will probably die in a turn of two, so this morale impact isn't shown. I don't know/remember if vanilla JA2 did more about enemy morale in tactical. However, it was improved somehow by suppression fire and your (marvellous) surrender system. It just lacks some efficient global system.
I thereby support Mauser's view and hope JAF will implement a deep morale system, for both friend and foe.
FlugenteMorale penalty do the enemy depending on the enemy side are a bad point gamewise. While it may be 'realistic' that the enemy side has low morale after the player crushes them again and again, this would make the lategame easier than the midgame. A game shouldn't get easier later on needlessly.
In JA2, Deidranna was a scenaristic counterforce to it. Soldiers were forced to fight, their family would die otherwise.
I agree late game shouldn't be too easy, but enemy morale may be considered in other ways as Mauser explains. The strategic AI can change its stance, the soldiers can retreat from some spots or disband, the scenario and the cutscenes can play a role too, like Deidrann's in JA2...
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Re: Moral[message #321341] |
Mon, 03 June 2013 22:05 | |
| The_Bob
|
|
Messages:415
Registered:May 2009
Location: Behind you. |
|
|
|
Low "tactical" morale might result in soldiers refusing to carry out orders or simply fall back to some solid cover and refuse to move/change stance. Kinda like suppression now works, which results in getting pinned down. Although I think I'm getting fear and morale mixed up at this point. A soldier that's about to panic may be unable to take aimed shots, fire uncontrolled bursts and lob grenades at any sign of danger, even at empty ground. Getting increasingly twitchy, eventually either going berserk or curling up into a little ball of useless. This would basically require a separate "panic AI" which might also take over player's mercs if they get into a situation they can't handle.
This would definitely add some depth to the little morale bar, making it harder to push mercs to the limit. OTOH, this would likely end up just annoying players, with silly low level mercs getting scared too easily and refusing to lay down covering fire because they saw 10 enemy soldiers coming their way.
But for making enemy soldiers become unpredictable once they're near defeat, this might be interesting. Overall morale might affect how susceptible soldiers are to these panic attacks, later on having less effect due to higher level enemy troops.
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Feb 27 11:11:15 EET 2021
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02856 seconds
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
