Home » CHIT-CHAT » All About Gaming » About gaming industry today (After SOE/Daybreak massive layoffs)
About gaming industry today[message #339399] Thu, 12 February 2015 00:50 Go to next message
Shanga

 
Messages:3512
Registered:January 2000
Location: Danubia
Found a great comment on Kotaku, that tells a very comprehensive inside story of the gaming world and that can apply to any context, including that of JA.

http://kotaku.com/big-layoffs-at-everquest-studio-today-1685243961

Quote:
What I seem to hear whenever there is a layoff:

"Money-grubbing jerks!"

"Poor management!"

"Big studios are evil!"

This seems so short-sighted to me. As a dev who's gone through two layoffs at two different studios (survived one, not the other), I'm not emotionally distant from this problem, believe me. The games industry is broken in general, and it's due to many factors. Players expect more and more for less and less money. Studios are sometimes labelled "greedy" because their game isn't free to play. As a result, studios know they need to ramp up hires on a massive scale and push games out very quickly, otherwise the long development cycle would be unsustainable (staff is the #1 cost of production). Therefore, it's understood in the industry that unless a game is a runaway success, there will likely be a layoff in staff shortly after launch. We devs buff up our resumés around launch time, in anticipation of layoffs. Large staffs are unsustainable, and small staffs are too small to get a game out in a relevant time frame.

It's simply a business decision. It's rarely that the management is making poor decisions and the studio is busted, it's that they're not making enough money to stay afloat. I know it sucks. Layoffs are awful for everyone involved (even the survivors, believe me). But what's the alternative? I hear lots of complaining, perhaps rightly so, but the aggression is often misdirected.

What would you have the studio do?

Hire a smaller, more manageable staff? Then you wouldn't get a game out in a reasonable time frame, or it would be immediately dated upon release, or infinitely shelved, or cost too much to make in the long run, as to cause a layoff anyway.

How about NOT have a massive layoff, and keep everyone employed? Then it's a matter of months before the entire studio goes under. Then you've lost 3 times the employees you otherwise would have, not to mention the games that studio would have produced.

Have a less bulky management? It may save you for a few months, but the salaries of the upper crust only staves off the problem. The cumulative salaries of the devs are almost always vastly outweighing the salaries of choice upper management positions. The first studio I worked at had too much management, my current studio does not. Yet we both went through layoffs, regardless of fat-cat salaries. Besides that, management does actually do valuable work (contrary to common opinion). I know, that's the evil capitalist speaking.

The truth is, management tries to get staff pumped up because it's important to the success of the studio. They want people to stay, and care about the project. They typically try really hard. Why? We live in an age of zero loyalty, compared to 50 years ago. Someone staying at a game studio 10+ years is all but unheard of, these days. People will jump ship on a studio in a second if something doesn't suite their desires, yet nobody blinks an eye when they only look out for #1. But as soon as the studio acts in ITS best interest, they're suddenly greedy jerks. Case in point: I worked with a dev at what I'll call "Studio A" which laid us both off. He moved to studio B for less than 6 months, before moving to Studio C, where I was employed. A matter of months later, he decided to move to Studio D. In less than a year and a half, he'd used 4 studios to bolster his resumé. He doesn't care about the individual projects or studios, only himself. He has the freedom to do this, and rightly so. But we champion this kind of loyalty-free self-promotion, while vilifying companies that do the "same", even though the companies survival is necessary to the survival of it's employees.

In short, I want everyone to be more thoughtful. It's not a simple equation every time there's a layoff. It's not always greed, corruption, and heartlessness. Devs care, management cares, studios care. It's just a difficult industry right now, and sustainability is very challenging. We can all be a little more understanding and helpful during these hard times, however. I know people like a villain to hate t though, so it's a tough pill to swallow.


Re: About gaming industry today[message #339813 is a reply to message #339399] Tue, 03 March 2015 14:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NikiAlex

 
Messages:42
Registered:December 2013
Location: Bulgaria
It's cruel and fast paced... like every other industry surrounding us
Re: About gaming industry today[message #340779 is a reply to message #339399] Tue, 28 April 2015 21:05 Go to previous message
Outland 17
Messages:7
Registered:April 2015

This is a real problem and no one really has the answer to it. Making games is really hard and we have pushed ourselves into a corner where it is nearly impossible to make great games and be good to the people who work on them. This is the greatest challenge facing our industry.
Previous Topic: Underail
Next Topic: Single Player And Multiplayer Begin To Merge
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Jun 25 05:03:08 EEST 2017

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00877 seconds