Home » MODDING HQ 1.13 » v1.13 General Development Talk » Git instead of Subversion as Source Versioning (Because VS supports git)
| Re: Git instead of Subversion as Source Versioning[message #363484 is a reply to message #362325]
|
Thu, 08 July 2021 15:49 
|
|
 rasz |
 |
Messages:37
Registered:August 2006 |
|
|
Kitty wrote on Sun, 07 February 2021 17:09
- I like the SVN-logs, they are easy to access and give me a good idea on where to look up what you coding-magicians have done. Would this be as easy with github?
- also the logs: I can lookup old features (feature x has been implemented with version y - I can look up log for version y to see what has been done). Would this be possible with github?
command line >git log produces pretty much same thing, plus you have this https://github.com/aimnas/ja2-1.13-source-mirror/commits/master
Kitty wrote on Sun, 07 February 2021 17:09
- since github seems to require more knowledge on handling, wouldn't this narrow down the amount of possible contributors instead of increasing the number?
SVN knowledge is approaching gray beard territory, every CS student on the other hand is required to know their way around git.
Kitty wrote on Sun, 07 February 2021 17:09
- some work seems to be required, but who's gonna prepare and do the moving from SVN to github?
seems whoever is running AIMNAS already performed smooth migration and is on top of merging SVN changes
silversurfer wrote on Mon, 08 February 2021 11:44
Also bug reports aren't going to be better on GitHub, just because there is an issues tracker. Actually they will probably be worse than here, if that is possible...
can you elaborate? proper issue tracker is the way to go instead of chasing randomly scattered forum threads.
[Updated on: Thu, 08 July 2021 15:53] Report message to a moderator
|
Private 1st Class
|
|
|
|
Current Time: Fri Jun 12 19:59:11 GMT+3 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00657 seconds
|
Blog
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
