Home » JAGGED ALLIANCE 3 » JA 3 Wish List » JA:what we *wont* be getting
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting[message #3514]
|
Sun, 27 June 2004 01:02 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/up.png)
|
|
TrooperThorn |
![](/images/ranks/corporal.png) |
Messages:61
Registered:November 2002 |
|
|
@Slayer:
I totally agree with you. For me JA is like a action movie that I get to play out by controlling the mercs. Their wit, morbid sense of humor, and faults makes it entertaining. I have read many posts where people want realism in the game. The more I read and thought about it the less I was in agreement. Realistic if you get shot in the real world you are going to go into shock and be incapcitated pretty quickly unless it's a light fresh wound, than you have to worry about infection. Forget body armor.
As for a few exploding heads, bodies that turn into crispy critters, vultures picking at the bones, that's not so bad. Chances are you will see far worst on the nightly news.
It's a game. A war game. A shooting game. Things get blown up, soldiers get shot. As I recall there are options that allow you turn some of that stuff off if it offends you. Jagged Alliance has been out for years now. I don't recall any big outrage in the public over the aspects of it's animations. Maybe I missed it, I don't know.
I say the game is good the way it is. Leave it alone. Tweak the things that need to be tweaked and leave the rest of it as is. Sure, maybe some of the things can be toned down. I personally do not find these aspects of the game to be as offensive as some of the aspects of other games I have seen out there. Why is it ok to go around shooting and chopping up zombies and the walking dead, but not ok to shoot up a red shirt or elite enemy soldier? I don't see that big a difference. It's all depicting violence. If you don't want violence in your games then play the non violent games.
Report message to a moderator
|
Corporal
|
|
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: Lasakon on Fri, 25 June 2004 21:34
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: Harper on Sat, 26 June 2004 01:28
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: Mazky on Sat, 26 June 2004 03:09
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: slayer on Sun, 27 June 2004 00:03
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: Di^^^ on Sun, 27 June 2004 01:30
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: slayer on Sun, 27 June 2004 06:42
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: Harper on Sun, 27 June 2004 07:51
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: slayer on Sun, 27 June 2004 09:50
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: slayer on Sun, 27 June 2004 10:03
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: Cybro on Fri, 02 July 2004 01:57
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: brandon on Sat, 14 May 2005 05:01
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: Sooner on Sat, 28 May 2005 04:46
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: hoioh on Mon, 25 July 2005 02:59
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: KIA on Tue, 02 August 2005 06:04
|
![Read Message Read Message](/theme/Bear_Classic_Brown/images/read.png) |
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: Doc Croc on Fri, 05 August 2005 14:57
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Feb 14 13:23:48 GMT+2 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01666 seconds
|