Home » JAGGED ALLIANCE 3 » JA 3 Wish List » JA:what we *wont* be getting
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting[message #3534]
|
Tue, 02 August 2005 06:04
|
|
KIA |
|
Messages:92
Registered:November 2002 Location: Virginia (USA) |
|
|
The "real" reason why developers tend to eliminate blood splashes, etc. is because the German laws prohibit any depiction of blood or viscera in videogames. Germany is a big market, therefore they have no intention of even developing a game which cannot be marketed in Germany. The common practice is to use a software-toggle for US markets and to software-disable the splashes in the German market. Simple problem, simple solution. I like to have the option to customize my games and parents or people with different values should have the right to customize their game to their tastes too.
As for the philosophy behind removing the gore, I personally believe it should be left in. The act of shooting another human being should never be trivialized. "Bloodless" movies of the 1950's and 1960's led one to believe that death was a quick, clean solution to all problems. If you're really anti-war and anti-violence, you should be insisting that the true results of the violence be revealed in it full nauseating detail. Nothing like the stench of old meat to make one retch up their own mortality. But this is a game. The head-popping graphics, mercenaries' quips and comments, etc. tend to distance one from the violence just as soldiers who are on the front lines tend to impersonalize conflict to retain their sanity. I, for one, think a very good balance between the real horror of war and the potentially trite nature of a perfectly sanitized version was struck by Sir-Tech. If you've got something right, don't change the formula.
Report message to a moderator
|
Corporal 1st Class
|
|
|
|
|
JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: Lasakon on Fri, 25 June 2004 21:34
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: Harper on Sat, 26 June 2004 01:28
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: Mazky on Sat, 26 June 2004 03:09
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: slayer on Sun, 27 June 2004 00:03
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: Di^^^ on Sun, 27 June 2004 01:30
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: slayer on Sun, 27 June 2004 06:42
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: Harper on Sun, 27 June 2004 07:51
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: slayer on Sun, 27 June 2004 09:50
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: slayer on Sun, 27 June 2004 10:03
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: Cybro on Fri, 02 July 2004 01:57
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: brandon on Sat, 14 May 2005 05:01
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: Sooner on Sat, 28 May 2005 04:46
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: hoioh on Mon, 25 July 2005 02:59
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: KIA on Tue, 02 August 2005 06:04
|
|
|
Re: JA:what we *wont* be getting
By: Doc Croc on Fri, 05 August 2005 14:57
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Feb 11 20:37:12 GMT+2 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00903 seconds
|