* Changed/disabled internal (Plot) armour items, <usItemClass> was 2048, now 1
- - 443. Helmet
- - 444. Vest
- - 445. Leggings

Wil473 wrote on Sat, 23 July 2016 18:57

* Changed/disabled internal (Plot) armour items, <usItemClass> was 2048, now 1
- - 443. Helmet
- - 444. Vest
- - 445. Leggings

So,that was a problem with armor bugs?

i have freeze with mini-tavor in 5.45x39 config,gun allow you to atach 5.56 c-mag adaptor,but after this action when you want load ammo,game freeze with error message on screen[i try post it later]

Wil473 wrote on Sat, 23 July 2016 18:57

* Changed/disabled internal (Plot) armour items, <usItemClass> was 2048, now 1
- - 443. Helmet
- - 444. Vest
- - 445. Leggings

So,that was a problem with armor bugs?

I've reverted all remaining mod armour items to use the values from Game Dir 2329 (not the current SCI but the current SCI seems to crash the XMLEditor). I'm going to release Experimental 4 with stock(like) v1.13 values - perhaps will go back to implemented my ideas for armour at a later date (ie. I still cannot really justify the armoured leggings in-game, perhaps make them Sci-fi?)

Mere real world existence - aside from full EOD suits, I cannot seem to find examples of ballistic leg protection in pants/legging form. Plenty of cycling, motor biking and industrial protective gear in Kevlar and similar materials however. Right now I just want to be able to have a side-by-side comparison of AFS to v1.13 to make sure there isn't something outside the expected XML's causing the stats issue.

I should be on-track for a weekend release of Experimental 4 (though my weekend does not seem to coincide with that of most people). I just fixed some errors with Item Flags.

This should be a fair match for our selection of ballistic pants. As a bonus, there's also a company selling ballistic boxers.

AmmoTypes.xml is not updated.Weapons do 1 or none damage at all!!!

Treated armors have more protection then coated-it is a mismatch too.

As far as the Treated vs Coated armours, I'm going to wait for that to be fixed in v1.13 before changing anything.

Thank you for update.Armors stats now work fine and weapons has fixed their damage.

Wil473 wrote on Sun, 07 August 2016 06:35

As far as the Treated vs Coated armours, I'm going to wait for that to be fixed in v1.13 before changing anything.

There is nothing to fix in that regard in 1.13. Check this post and upwards for the decision making process behind the new values.
Royal Jelly is a different pair of shoes now compared to C-18. The jelly provides less armor bonus because it has only bonuses whereas the C-18 comes with penalties.

bug report:Norinco QX4 order eight from br,in delivery one piece,mising g11 pdw &g11 ar

ok.. i think your multi-caliber system working fine,on weekend i have some freetime from my work,there be more playtesting new afs ...

v1.13 (GameDir 2329) / AFS (Experimental 4)

Flak
----
Abilities
AP 	-1/-5
Stealth -10/0

NCTH
%Base 	S:-5/-5  C:-10/-10  P:-7/-7
%Cap	S:-2/ 0	 C: -4/ 0   P:-3/ 0
%CF Acc	S:-5/-5	 C:-10/-10  P:-7/-7

Bonuses
Aimed Shot -2/-4


Treated Flak
------------
Abilities
AP 	-2/-5
Stealth -13/0

NCTH
%Base 	S:-6/-5	 C:-12/-10  P:-9/-7
%Cap	S:-3/ 0	 C: -5/ 0   P:-4/ 0
%CF Acc	S:-6/-5	 C:-12/-10  P:-9/-7

Bonuses
Aimed Shot -3/-4


Coated Flak
-----------
Abilities
AP 	-1/-5
Stealth -7/0

NCTH
%Base 	S:-3/-5  C: -5/-10  P:-4/-7
%Cap	S:-1/ 0	 C: -2/ 0   P:-2/ 0
%CF Acc	S:-3/-5	 C: -5/-10  P:-4/-7

Bonuses
Aimed Shot -1/-4

Mere real world existence - aside from full EOD suits, I cannot seem to find examples of ballistic leg protection in pants/legging form. Plenty of cycling, motor biking and industrial protective gear in Kevlar and similar materials however.

...
is this normal?

Triple Posting as nobody's commented about Experimental 5 (a good thing?)

fb msbs is very interesting in .223 variant,other if you can have set of barrels in aditional caliber's ... one variant in .223 have have bug relater to ugl which is build for this guns ,you can atach endless number of ugl on slot,but ugl wont show up ....